[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IX in France
- Subject: IX in France
- From: virendra.rode at gmail.com (virendra rode)
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:28:43 -0800
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <DFB728D80D51BC489529E01B6D924D8FDC29@DB3PRD0402MB119.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <7A848D4888ADA94B8A46A17296740133B38D4AE3E2@DEXTER.oasis-tech.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 02/23/2012 10:00 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2012, at 12:39 PM, virendra rode wrote:
>
>> I understand this is not true peering relationship, however its an
>> interesting way to obtain exchange point routes and I understand this is
>> nothing new.
>
> <mini-rant>
- ----------------------
>
> I've found people who use the term 'peering' to mean something different than what I personally interpret it to mean.
>
> eg: "We have peering with 4 carriers at our colocation facility where you can place gear"
>
> Translation: We have blended IP transit from 4 carriers, or you can directly connect to them as needed.
>
> I understand why they call it this, because "I configured peering with Level3/Cogent" on my router, etc. The difference is in the policy. What you're speaking of is someone selling transit, which is perfectly fine over various IXes, you generally are prohibited from 'selling next-hop', i.e.: you have to bear the cost on the IX port of the forwarding.
>
> </mini-rant>
- ---------------------------
Correct, I meant to say private peering as opposed to settlement-free.
>
> Buying transit isn't as dirty as people think it is, sometimes its the right business decision. If you connect to an IX for $4000/mo at gig-e, you might as well buy transit at $4/meg on that same port IMHO. You're unlikely to be using the port at 100% anyways at the IX, so your cost-per-meg there needs to properly reflect your 95% or whatnot.
>
> - Jared
- ----------------------
I understand, I'm trying to factor in cost of peering (transport,
equipment, cross-connect, colocation, equipment cost) of buying transit
vs private peering.
regards,
/virendra
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iF4EAREIAAYFAk9GhVsACgkQ3HuimOHfh+HqFgD+L2WYr2Tt1ZRY+Z2AAVDpX00N
bwNSXKLbnzjy8Ol5b2QA/AiL3NbesEoZy901tBW7TAdAzPOUK8W9a4rnhRakDk8B
=acfM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----