[no subject]

One of the key defining differences (IMHO) is that an enterprise (mostly) trusts the employees connected to its network whereas an ISP and a University cannot.

Owen

On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:08 AM, Shumon Huque wrote:

> We run IS-IS at the University of Pennsylvania as the IGP for
> IPv6. I know of a few other non-ISPs too but I won't speak for 
> them. At the time we initially deployed IPv6, it was pretty
> much one of the few safe choices (OSPFv3 implementations were 
> very new then).
> 
> --Shumon.
> 
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:00:04AM -0600, Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. wrote:
>> "ISIS is used in organizations other than ISPs" Any examples you can share
>> of some other than ISPs?
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joel jaeggli [mailto:joelja at bogus.com] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:58 PM
>> To: Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D.
>> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Common operational misconceptions
>> 
>> On 2/15/12 21:04 , Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. wrote:
>>> How widespread would you say the use of IS-IS is?
>>> 
>>> Even more as to which routing protocols are used, not just in ISPs, 
>>> what percent would you give to the various ones. In other words X 
>>> percent of organizations use OSPS, Y percent use EIGRP, and so on.
>> 
>> Using EIGRP implies your routed IGP dependent infrastructure is a
>> monoculture. That's probably infeasible without compromise even if you are
>> largely a Cisco shop.
>> 
>> ISIS is used in organizations other than ISPs.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Shumon Huque
> University of Pennsylvania.