[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Hijacked Network Ranges
- Subject: Hijacked Network Ranges
- From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:56:51 +0530
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CANEysbE7GiFM++ykwiO0nBmfPvWHw_KSPUFDPfNbM5Y2TL1kMw@mail.gmail.com> <CANEysbH_n5SCCtvyv80aJQqNxN6kNJiVF_UADFu+0tQcUfEq1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAG9TQPmSMVZ9NoL5JBFx8uLuzRn2GPogc8zsBBtdrGu6bMptJQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
I had this happen to me in 2008 -
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/110097
Total pain in the ass when it does happen. Funnily enough in that
case it was another downstream of the same ISP who was pulling this
stunt ..
--srs
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Mark Tinka <mtinka at globaltransit.net> wrote:
>
>
> The fact that the hijacking ISP's upstreams accepted routes
> through their network that didn't belong to that ISP is bad
> enough.
>
> That we should still be able to advertise anything without
> an appropriate filter being in place and expecting it to
> work (even if it's with good intention, as in this case) is
> equally as bad.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)