[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Console Server Recommendation
- Subject: Console Server Recommendation
- From: frnkblk at iname.com (Frank Bulk)
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:15:53 -0600
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CALFTrnOinwxic_uz+AjpmnGq=ryTgupH5D5pexRt13bCTD07Ng@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
We use WTI, too, just don't like it that it reboots to apply a change.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher O'Brien [mailto:obriapqz at bc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 9:59 AM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Console Server Recommendation
On 1/30/12 11:08 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> What are people using for console servers these days? We've
> historically used retired routers with ASYNC ports, but it's time for
> an upgrade.
>
> OpenGear seems to have some nice stuff, anyone else?
>
I've been using Western Telematic TSM-40 console servers and have been
very happy with the price point and feature set.
Also, I aggregate console connections from different parts of my campus
over my existing fiber plant using TC Communications TC1880 Async Fiber
MUXs. This combination has served me well.