[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?

Subject: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?
From: dot at dotat.at (Tony Finch)
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 17:04:54 +0100
In-reply-to: <CAAAwwbWH0ahP1UpB63AF34SxAEAS+r7S6ShDp1T=bs3kayB-RQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbU=VF=dumJ2Q_xMb+9gBaNxFT2pMN9c__pQGAetZzmKPQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGVuNoqRhGw_UMVQtkJ-zToM8NGB2aLk=wjtc0J7Fh8XUw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGWQbUj2GW-49Oc8DykMMkgL6bWGvY0hyCggMKsWKmi_Nw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbWH0ahP1UpB63AF34SxAEAS+r7S6ShDp1T=bs3kayB-RQ@mail.gmail.com>

The relevant spec is RFC 5321 section 5.

Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/

On 31 Jul 2012, at 03:27, Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Aside from that RFC974 [Page 3] gives mailers significant leeway in
> deciding how to handle errors:

Prev by Date: cost of misconfigurations
Next by Date: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?
Previous by thread: Procera Networks contact
Next by thread: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread