[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

rpki vs. secure dns?

Subject: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: rubensk at gmail.com (Rubens Kuhl)
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:21:34 -0300
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> In case you feel a BGP announcement should not be "RPKI Invalid" but something else, you do what's described on slide 15-17:
>
> https://ripe64.ripe.net/presentations/77-RIPE64-Plenery-RPKI.pdf

The same currently happens with DNSSEC, doing what Comcast calls
"negative trust anchors":
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors-01




Rubens

Follow-Ups:
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: regnauld at nsrc.org (Phil Regnauld)

References:
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: alexb at ripe.net (Alex Band)
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: alexb at ripe.net (Alex Band)
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: regnauld at nsrc.org (Phil Regnauld)
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: alexb at ripe.net (Alex Band)

Prev by Date: rpki vs. secure dns?
Next by Date: rpki vs. secure dns?
Previous by thread: rpki vs. secure dns?
Next by thread: rpki vs. secure dns?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread