[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE
He.net tunnels are also good to have because depending on your provider,
there's still many with incomplete views of the ipv6 routing table and he
might have a path. This is a more prevalent issue with ipv6 than v4 at the
moment.
On Apr 11, 2012 2:03 PM, "Anurag Bhatia" <me at anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
> Hi Seth
>
>
> I just did a test from Eu based server sitting below EU based HE Tunnel
> node by downloading Ubuntu release file from US based server. This does not
> tells about possible high speed but surely tells what is available atleast.
> Server itself is sitting on M-Online with 100Mbps pipe.
>
>
>
>
> IPv4:
>
> traceroute to mirror.anl.gov (146.137.96.7), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> 1 gw.giga-dns.com (91.194.90.1) [AS51167] 16.876 ms 16.925 ms 16.915
> ms
> 2 host-93-104-204-33.customer.m-online.net (93.104.204.33) [AS8767]
> 1.166 ms 1.449 ms 1.445 ms
> 3 xe-2-1-0.rt-decix-1.m-online.net (212.18.6.162) [AS8767] 8.889 ms
> 8.888 ms 8.880 ms
> 4 20gigabitethernet4-3.core1.fra1.he.net (80.81.192.172) [AS6695]
> 18.586
> ms 19.831 ms 19.824 ms
> 5 10gigabitethernet1-4.core1.par2.he.net (184.105.213.162) [AS6939]
> 18.794 ms 18.789 ms 10gigabitethernet2-2.core1.par2.he.net (72.52.92.26)
> [AS6939] 18.437 ms
> 6 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.par2.he.net (184.105.213.90) [AS6939]
> 18.507 ms 10gigabitethernet7-1.core1.ash1.he.net (184.105.213.93)
> [AS6939]
> 96.880 ms 97.345 ms
> 7 esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18) [AS6939]
> 95.544 ms 10gigabitethernet7-1.core1.ash1.he.net (184.105.213.93)
> [AS6939]
> 97.616 ms esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18)
> [AS6939] 95.354 ms
> 8 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 97.835 ms
> esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18) [AS6939]
> 95.727
> ms washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 98.492 ms
> 9 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 98.463 ms
> washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (134.55.220.54) [AS293] 110.668 ms 110.641
> ms
> 10 starsdn1-ip-washsdn2.es.net (134.55.218.65) [AS293] 120.357 ms
> 120.844 ms washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (134.55.220.54) [AS293] 110.834
> ms
> 11 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (134.55.219.25) [AS293] 164.788 ms
> 164.548
> ms 164.550 ms
> 12 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (134.55.219.25) [AS293] 164.758 ms
> anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (134.55.219.53) [AS293] 128.288 ms 128.286 ms
> 13 guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.532 ms
> anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (134.55.219.53) [AS293] 128.263 ms
> guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.500 ms
> 14 * guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.687 ms
> 117.858 ms
> 15 * * *
> 16 * * *
> 17 * * *
> 18 * * *
>
>
> root at server7:/home/anurag/tmp# wget -4
>
> http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
> --2012-04-11 21:56:46--
>
> http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
> Resolving mirror.anl.gov... 146.137.96.7
> Connecting to mirror.anl.gov|146.137.96.7|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 1644474368 (1.5G) [application/octet-stream]
> Saving to: `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso.1'
>
>
> 100%[============================================================================================================================>]
> 1,644,474,368 4.78M/s in 5m 38s
>
> 2012-04-11 22:02:25 (4.64 MB/s) - `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso.1' saved
> [1644474368/1644474368]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> IPv6:
>
>
> traceroute to mirror.anl.gov (2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9), 30 hops
> max, 80 byte packets
> 1 2001:470:25:78f::1 (2001:470:25:78f::1) [AS6939] 18.918 ms 21.147 ms
> 23.357 ms
> 2 gige-g2-20.core1.zrh1.he.net (2001:470:0:11d::1) [AS6939] 23.341 ms
> 23.324 ms 23.797 ms
> 3 10gigabitethernet5-1.core1.fra1.he.net (2001:470:0:21c::1) [AS6939]
> 29.781 ms 30.252 ms 23.671 ms
> 4 10gigabitethernet5-3.core1.lon1.he.net (2001:470:0:1d2::1) [AS6939]
> 37.897 ms 37.880 ms 43.095 ms
> 5 10gigabitethernet7-4.core1.nyc4.he.net (2001:470:0:128::1) [AS6939]
> 104.552 ms 105.763 ms 105.742 ms
> 6 10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.ash1.he.net (2001:470:0:36::1) [AS6939]
> 113.963 ms 114.467 ms 111.478 ms
> 7
> lawrence-berkeley-national-laboratory.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net
> (2001:470:1:27f::2)
> [AS6939] 109.467 ms 109.452 ms 109.435 ms
> 8 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (2001:400:0:15a::1) [AS293] 115.929 ms
> 113.625 ms 115.896 ms
> 9 washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (2001:400:0:e0::2) [AS293] 114.606 ms
> 112.068 ms 112.045 ms
> 10 starsdn1-ip-washsdn2.es.net (2001:400:0:ab::1) [AS293] 126.783 ms
> 130.008 ms 126.747 ms
> 11 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (2001:400:0:a2::2) [AS293] 127.268 ms
> 124.223 ms 124.125 ms
> 12 anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (2001:400:0:c0::1) [AS293] 128.066 ms 130.529
> ms 130.513 ms
> 13 2001:400:2202:8::2 (2001:400:2202:8::2) [AS293] 130.976 ms 128.915 ms
> 128.892 ms
> 14 * * *
> 15 * * *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> root at server7:/home/anurag/tmp# wget -6
>
> http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
> --2012-04-11 21:45:52--
>
> http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
> Resolving mirror.anl.gov... 2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9
> Connecting to mirror.anl.gov|2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9|:80...
> connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 1644474368 (1.5G) [application/octet-stream]
> Saving to: `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso'
>
>
> 100%[============================================================================================================================>]
> 1,644,474,368 *3.66M/s in 6m 11s*
>
> 2012-04-11 21:52:04 (4.22 MB/s) - `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso' saved
> [1644474368/1644474368]
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Seth Mos <seth.mos at dds.nl> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Op 11 apr 2012, om 20:16 heeft Anurag Bhatia het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > > Also, does it makes sense to go for BGP Tunnel for now? I just setup
> IPv6
> > > Tunnel via Hurricane Electric. Latency seems pretty much OK ~ 10-15ms
> of
> > > overhead. Yet to test other parameters. I heard Tunnels are usually
> bad.
> > > Can someone tell how to test this tunnel setup to confirm if there is a
> > > performance issue or not? I am thinking of writing a quick bash script
> > and
> > > run via cron to test latency, packet loss and bandwidth throughput for
> > > couple of days. If anyone has better idea, please let me know.
> >
> > Also using a HE.net BGP tunnel for our IPv6, simply because having just 1
> > native provider with Ipv6 isn't redundant. That and it's 8mbit.
> >
> > The v4 connection which the tunnel connects over is 90mbit, and the
> tunnel
> > needs to travel from NL to DE for the FRA BGP peering.
> >
> > I'm getting about 40mbit through the IPv6 tunnel, so i'd say it works
> > well, although the throughput has slowly been dropping to the 30's range
> > over the last 6 months. But that's probably because of the latency.
> >
> > For something that is provided for free I'm really glad we have it.
> >
> > I should have peered with their UK PoP as it's much closer by latency,
> > thus faster.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Seth
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Anurag Bhatia
> anuragbhatia.com
> or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected
> network!
>
> Twitter: @anurag_bhatia <https://twitter.com/#!/anurag_bhatia>
> Linkedin: http://linkedin.anuragbhatia.com
>