[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SORBS?!
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 07:31:47 -0400, Drew Weaver said:
> That's just not true, we would much rather be notified of something that a
> reputation list finds objectionable and take it down ourselves than have
> Senderbase set a poor reputation on dozens of IaaS customers.
If it was industry-wide standard practice that just notifying a provider resulted
in something being done, we'd not need things like Senderbase, which is after
all basically a list of people who don't take action when notified...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120406/bfb7f577/attachment.bin>
- Follow-Ups:
- SORBS?!
- From: drew.weaver at thenap.com (Drew Weaver)
- SORBS?!
- From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)
- References:
- SORBS?!
- From: cconn at b2b2c.ca (Chris Conn)
- SORBS?!
- From: sam.oduor at gmail.com (Sam Oduor)
- SORBS?!
- From: drew.weaver at thenap.com (Drew Weaver)
- SORBS?!
- From: goemon at anime.net (goemon at anime.net)
- SORBS?!
- From: drew.weaver at thenap.com (Drew Weaver)