[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

airFiber

I was told to expect 0.1ms by UBNT.  Haven't seen this published, though.

Josh

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Dylan Bouterse <dylan at corp.power1.com> wrote:
> What published specs have you seen on the airFiber latency? I asked one of the UBNT guys and they said it's microsecond. On any network I've managed, anything sub 1ms is acceptable.
>
> Dylan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John van Oppen [mailto:jvanoppen at spectrumnet.us]
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 2:22 PM
> To: 'Andrew McConachie'; Marshall Eubanks
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: RE: airFiber
>
> We actually have a lot of the old gigabeam radios in service, they are faster than the published specs of the airfiber links (1G full duplex vs 750 mbit/sec fd) and lower latency due to their very simplistic design. ? ? To be honest, from a network engineering standpoint, the gigabeams were conveninet as path issues would show up as ethernet errors that can be used to trigger reroutes or other events. ? ?That being said, we did not have a large variety of switches as the microwave side of our house is made up entirely of just a couple of cisco models. ? ?The gigabeams also have a pure OOB management setup.
>
>
> John
>
>