[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Colocation providers and ACL requests
- Subject: Colocation providers and ACL requests
- From: paul at paulgraydon.co.uk (Paul Graydon)
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:15:19 -1000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On 10/25/2011 08:43 AM, Christopher Pilkington wrote:
> Is it common in the industry for a colocation provider, when requested to put an egress ACL facing us such as:
>
> deny udp any a.b.c.d/24 eq 80
>
> ?to refuse and tell us we must subscribe to their managed DDOS product?
>
> -cjp
>
>
For colo? No, filtering is the customers concern, unless failure to do
so is causing a problem for the colo network. Such services are almost
always paid for add-ons to a colo package. The colocation business is
usually fairly low on the profit margin with most companies trying to
get away with the bare minimum possible over and above the basics.