[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Please change Mailman back to NOT force the rewrite for Reply-to
- Subject: Please change Mailman back to NOT force the rewrite for Reply-to
- From: ges at wingfoot.org (Glenn Sieb)
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:21:58 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <20111015170253.5c53f2bd@milhouse> <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/11 5:17 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
>>> Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps
>>> only on Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm
>>> doing the public service of pointing it out, while asking that
>>> it be adjusted back.
>>
>> I don't see that; I have to specifically choose to reply to the
>> list. Maybe someone, like me, sets their own reply-to to the
>> list.
>
> From the headers.
>
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To:
> nanog at nanog.org List-Id: North American Network Operators Group
> <nanog.nanog.org>
>
> Mutt asks me, but other mailers might not.
I think you missed John's last sentence, Phil...
For instance, on *this* email, and *your* email, a reply goes to the
individual. I have to specifically put the list address in.
Perhaps Lynda hit someone's manually-set Reply-to header and thought
it was set by Mailman...
Best,
- --Glenn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk6Z+XYACgkQf5MxTDXTimFXRgCfUTlQmwPfqL6atcwoGyRi5ERq
+7IAoIyILrdRDekx0tnxLw6qV/FhqelS
=1Vrf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----