[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters?

Subject: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters?
From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:30:52 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <CAK4no07pVY2G=Kok-_2vwHcXQqtdXt5rmBbZWchLWo1k6jnE0A@mail.gmail.com>

----- Original Message -----
> From: "steve pirk [egrep]" <steve at pirk.com>

> What was so funny was that someone got Internic/Network Solutions to up the
> limit. Apparently just to save some money on reprinting movie posters... ok,
> so they would have had to change some trailers...
> ;-]

"3com.com"

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274

Follow-Ups:
- Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters?
  - From: joe at nethead.com (Joe Hamelin)

References:
- Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters?
  - From: steve at pirk.com (steve pirk [egrep])

Prev by Date: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters?
Next by Date: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters?
Previous by thread: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters?
Next by thread: Were A record domain names ever limited to 23 characters?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread