[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?

Subject: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:30:50 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAF976C9.1B7412%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

I believe those have been obsoleted, but, /64 remains the best choice, IMHO.

Owen

On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:00 AM, McCall, Gabriel wrote:

> Note that /127 is strongly discouraged in RFC5375 and RFC3627. 3627 suggests using /112 for router links, or /126 at the very most.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred at cisco.com] 
> ...
> I see no reason you couldn't use a /127 prefix if the link was point to point.
> ... 
>

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)

References:
- IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
  - From: John_Brzozowski at Cable.Comcast.com (Brzozowski, John)
- IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
  - From: fred at cisco.com (Fred Baker)
- IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
  - From: Gabriel.McCall at thyssenkrupp.com (McCall, Gabriel)

Prev by Date: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
Next by Date: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
Previous by thread: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
Next by thread: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread