[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

economic value of low AS numbers

Subject: economic value of low AS numbers
From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:08:34 -0800
In-reply-to: <CABO8Q6S3ihfzZyyGGCA-SYCvExR5gGSees1+idNznes0uL7Cjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMbSiYApG_e7SDiCdgL+RkY38nXExj+zt0No0a1AsU+yDkAZKg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CABO8Q6RzySTgkDh8GagduNpzjFFJ0bzmFZcwiWOMJu_Z0nJyZA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CABO8Q6S3ihfzZyyGGCA-SYCvExR5gGSees1+idNznes0uL7Cjw@mail.gmail.com>

On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
> You are discounting (pun intended) vanity and marketing.  I am no longer surprised at what people will be willing to pay (sometimes astonishing amounts of) money for.
> 
> I suppose I can't argue with that, but anyone technical enough to know what an AS is should know better. 

whois -h whois.arin.net 42

:-)

(no idea if any money changed hands)

Regards,
-drc

Follow-Ups:
- economic value of low AS numbers
  - From: davehart at gmail.com (Dave Hart)

References:
- economic value of low AS numbers
  - From: davehart at gmail.com (Dave Hart)
- economic value of low AS numbers
  - From: kloch at kl.net (Kevin Loch)
- economic value of low AS numbers
  - From: keegan.holley at sungard.com (Keegan Holley)
- economic value of low AS numbers
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- economic value of low AS numbers
  - From: keegan.holley at sungard.com (Keegan Holley)

Prev by Date: Fwd: Welcome to the "Marketing" mailing list
Next by Date: economic value of low AS numbers
Previous by thread: economic value of low AS numbers
Next by thread: economic value of low AS numbers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread