[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Arguing against using public IP space

Subject: Arguing against using public IP space
From: kauer at biplane.com.au (Karl Auer)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:07:56 +1100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 12:20 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> You are making assumptions about how the NAT is designed.
> [...]
> Unless you know the internals of a NAT you cannot say whether it
> fails open or closed.

Indeed not!

Follow-Ups:
- Arguing against using public IP space
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

References:
- Arguing against using public IP space
  - From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- Arguing against using public IP space
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)

Prev by Date: Arguing against using public IP space
Next by Date: Arguing against using public IP space
Previous by thread: Arguing against using public IP space
Next by thread: Arguing against using public IP space
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread