[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Arguing against using public IP space
- Subject: Arguing against using public IP space
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:08:07 -0800
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Nov 15, 2011, at 7:54 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
>> If you put a router where you needed a firewall, then, this is not a =
>> failure of the firewall, but, a
>> failure of the network implementor and the address space will not have =
>> any impact whatsoever
>> on your lack of security.
>
> And the difference between a router and a firewall is ...?
>
> Apparently, one bit.
IMHO, a firewall does not route packets by default, but, rather only forwards
those packets which match configured policies.
A router, OTOH, routes packets by default, but, may be configured with some
policy about which packets to forward.
The difference functionally is what happens when the configuration is
lost or corrupted. Essentially fail open vs. fail closed.
Owen