[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Ok; let's have the "Does DNAT contribute to Security" argument one more time...
- Subject: Ok; let's have the "Does DNAT contribute to Security" argument one more time...
- From: tvhawaii at shaka.com (Michael Painter)
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:05:42 -1000
- References: <[email protected]>
Jay Ashworth wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Valdis Kletnieks" <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu>
>
>>> On the other hand, since a firewall's job is to stop packets you
>>> don't want,
>>
>> One of Marcus Ranum's "5 Stupidest Security Blunders" - "enumerating
>> badness".
>> A firewall's job isn't to stop unwanted packets, it's to pass only
>> wanted packets.
>
> From 30,000ft those are equivalent.
Speaking of 30,000 ft., saw this on Dave Farber's IP list:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/110897184785831382163/posts/5qsNxFEaiML