[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[outages] More notes
- Subject: [outages] More notes
- From: bjorn at mork.no (Bjørn Mork)
- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:59:34 +0100
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (Stephane Bortzmeyer's message of "Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:21:37 +0100")
- References: <CAHsqw9sw1BbPMNUftpNUfoX7o2KVJNGPJHzN0itNxeE0JR6ADQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMKfM=gyKttBxgzYWA8zK=wbTEG0=te4eJEtwZO=g8cDoY2tVw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> writes:
> ("Given the
> complexity of conditions required to trigger this issue, the
> probability of exploiting this defect is extremely low").
Which translates to
"This bug has such catastrophic consequenses that we do not want to
disclose how to trigger it."
Do you think any such bug would be discovered and/or disclosed *at all*
unless it already was triggered in the wild? And if it was triggered
once, what are the chances it will happen again?
Bj?rn