[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
real data
- Subject: real data
- From: mathews at hawaii.edu (Robert Mathews (OSIA))
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:29:41 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAPQUSnPkHAV-O9u+mF=NOh0NcYPrtau6U80Mu-BUV3ASY4b-gw@mail.gmail.com> <1320678667.4104.1.camel@teh-desktop> <[email protected]> <CAPQUSnMpNowr9nEZcC=JKygM7G+As03_M777XybSEkLqP4KMog@mail.gmail.com> <1320683227.2220.108.camel@Andromeda> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On 11/7/2011 12:01 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> ..... It seems a quick view seems many TATA <-> Level3 and TATA <-> GBLX sets of instability.
>
> Combined with the overall update levels seen over that 30 minutes, we saw ~1.566M updates at route views.
> Compared with the 24h prior (2011.11.06 14:15 as reference) we see ~17-20x the updates in the same time period. Now take your control plane and make it work 17-20x as hard, and you can see why we had some even general instability.
Jared:
Thanks, for posting this, and for sharing data.
Too bad it is not Huawei that is involved. It has precluded someone, somewhere, from framing this SNAFU, a coordinated global
Cyber Event, instigated by the Chinese PLA. 8-;) Then, there is still time for that. [again, tongue firmly planted into cheek]
--
Dr. Robert Mathews, D.Phil.
Distinguished Senior Research Scholar - National Security Affairs & US Industrial Preparedness
University of Hawai'i (OSIA)
|-- Sent from "the mother-ship," high above the "blue planet."