[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

Subject: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: cmadams at hiwaay.net (Chris Adams)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:49:54 -0500
In-reply-to: <m2fwn5ptz3.wl%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m2fwn5ptz3.wl%[email protected]>

Once upon a time, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> said:
> > Now I'm tempted to be the guy that gets .mail
> 
> express that temptation in dollars, and well into two commas.

Imagine the "typo-squating" someone could do with .con.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

Follow-Ups:
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: richard.barnes at gmail.com (Richard Barnes)

References:
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: ikiris at gmail.com (Blake Dunlap)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

Prev by Date: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet?
Next by Date: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Previous by thread: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Next by thread: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread