[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses

Subject: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
From: leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com (Leigh Porter)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:30:35 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>

________________________________________
From: Jeff Wheeler [jsw at inconcepts.biz]


>This may sound crazy, and it is certainly not an ideal way of doing
>things; but it is an alternative worth consideration as networks
>exhaust their available IPv4.

I have not followed this whole thread, but did anybody suggest just using IPv6 for this?

--
Leigh Porter



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Follow-Ups:
- Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
  - From: tom at ninjabadger.net (Tom Hill)

References:
- Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
  - From: james at cs.fiu.edu (James Grace)
- Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)

Prev by Date: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
Next by Date: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
Previous by thread: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
Next by thread: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread