[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 routing protocols

Subject: IPv6 routing protocols
From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:30:50 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BANLkTi=6BzU+N+9Br4WjvxVmJBKbRw_rTbpD4DNr=52POaMAKQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 10 jun 2011, at 14:26, Nick Hilliard wrote:

[...]

Of course none of this supports your original claim:

> "IPv6 routing protocols also pretty much only use link locals".  This is not true in the general case.

References:
- Cogent IPv6
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Cogent IPv6
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Cogent IPv6
  - From: cra at WPI.EDU (Chuck Anderson)
- Cogent IPv6
  - From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)
- Cogent IPv6
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Cogent IPv6
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- Cogent IPv6
  - From: rps at maine.edu (Ray Soucy)
- Cogent IPv6
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- IPv6 routing protocols
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- IPv6 routing protocols
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- IPv6 routing protocols
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- IPv6 routing protocols
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- IPv6 routing protocols
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)

Prev by Date: IPv6 routing protocols
Next by Date: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6
Previous by thread: IPv6 routing protocols
Next by thread: IPv6 routing protocols
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread