[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)

Subject: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 05:37:00 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <EMEW3|8987863e5eed70015691b2e7f017afe7n52Ewr03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> 
> Things like happy-eyeballs diminish it even with perfect IPv6
> connectivity.  100ms rtt doesn't cover the world and to make
> multi-homed servers (includes dual stack) work well clients will
> make additional connections.

Is happy eyeballs actually running code ANYWHERE?

Owen

Follow-Ups:
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
  - From: dwcarder at wisc.edu (Dale W. Carder)
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)

References:
- Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
  - From: woody at pch.net (Bill Woodcock)
- Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
  - From: mail at jaidev.info (Jaidev Sridhar)
- Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
  - From: outsider at scarynet.org (Alexander Maassen)
- Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day)
  - From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar)
- Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day)
  - From: tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk (Tim Chown)
- Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day)
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Cameron Byrne)
- Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day)
  - From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar)
- Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day)
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
  - From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar)
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
  - From: jfesler at gigo.com (Jason Fesler)
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)

Prev by Date: Why don't ISPs peer with everyone?
Next by Date: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
Previous by thread: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
Next by thread: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread