[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers

Subject: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:47:24 -0700
In-reply-to: <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F34181275C86B58@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
References: <[email protected]> <CA545204.488B2%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F34181275C86B58@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>

On Jul 26, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Leo Vegoda wrote:

> You wrote:
>>> Also, one can argue that a dynamic prefix facilitates privacy ?
>> 
>> In Germany, there is significant political pushback against the idea to
>> give residential mom+pop static prefixed for that very reason.
> 
> Do German web sites not track users with cookies, then?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Leo

No, it's just a case of the German government not being very smart about
privacy.

Owen

References:
- dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
  - From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar)
- dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
  - From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
  - From: dr at cluenet.de (Daniel Roesen)
- dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
  - From: leo.vegoda at icann.org (Leo Vegoda)

Prev by Date: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
Next by Date: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
Previous by thread: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
Next by thread: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread