[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Spam?
- Subject: Spam?
- From: james.cutler at consultant.com (Cutler James R)
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:45:29 -0400
- In-reply-to: <op.vyihdmrewjyiia@osprey>
- References: <[email protected]> <m2bowz36cv.wl%[email protected]> <CANQy6FYGSQ=Yw3fAZ=PUQdycOkZwojcsAQ5zbt2Y+P2kmbUx-g@mail.gmail.com> <op.vyihdmrewjyiia@osprey>
On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Thomas Donnelly wrote:
> I received no spam, and had I received 2 pieces, it may have been slightly irritating.
>
> What is irritating is the sheer number of people complaining about it. Can we stop please? I think they get it.
>
> -=Tom
>
Tom, you are one of the lucky ones -- I have received over two dozen SPAM via NANOG in the last 24 hours.
And, yes, it would be gratifying to know why the change - is the new configuration less expensive? (to the list manager, not us, obviously)
Also, where is the reply to header?
James R. Cutler
james.cutler at consultant.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Spam?
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- References:
- Spam?
- From: paul at paulgraydon.co.uk (Paul Graydon)
- Spam?
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Spam?
- From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)
- Spam?
- From: tad1214 at gmail.com (Thomas Donnelly)