[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life

Subject: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life
From: jarod.smouth at gmail.com (jarod smith)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:18:14 +0100

Although it would seem that double-stack is still the preferred method of linux
distribution, I want my next deployed in IPv6 only.
For linux there is NAT-PT tomicki and NAT64 Viagenie.

I don't have Cisco equipment although I'd like tested their NAT-PT, even if
it's obsolete.

Are some of you have installed one of these two implementations in
production on recent versions of linux? Is it stable, secure, ... ?


Regards

Follow-Ups:
- NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life
  - From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
- NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life
  - From: jarod.smouth at gmail.com (jarod smith)
- NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Cameron Byrne)
- NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life
  - From: strizhov at netsec.colostate.edu (Mikhail Strizhov)

Prev by Date: PacketExchange/Mzima
Next by Date: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life
Previous by thread: PacketExchange/Mzima
Next by thread: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread