[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
quietly....
On 14 feb 2011, at 6:46, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Requiring them to be on certain well known addresses is restrictive and
> creates an unnecessary digression from IPv4 practice. It's comments like
> this that raise the hair on admins' necks. At least mine.
I don't get this. Why spend cycles discovering a value that doesn't need to change?
But I lost this argument in the IETF years ago, so I guess I'm relatively alone here.
- Follow-Ups:
- quietly....
- From: davei at otd.com (David Israel)
- quietly....
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- References:
- quietly....
- From: rcarpen at network1.net (Randy Carpenter)
- quietly....
- From: davei at otd.com (Dave Israel)
- quietly....
- From: drais at icantclick.org (david raistrick)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: kauer at biplane.com.au (Karl Auer)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: cmadams at hiwaay.net (Chris Adams)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: davei at otd.com (Dave Israel)
- quietly....
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- quietly....
- From: frnkblk at iname.com (Frank Bulk)