[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
quietly....
In article <20110204000954.A64C79A9FED at drugs.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews
<marka at isc.org> writes
>> These are just my straw poll of what may be difficult for small
>> enterprises in a change to IPv6.
>
>It isn't "change to", its "add IPv6".
>
>I expect to see IPv4 used for years inside homes and enterprises
>where there is enough IPv4 addresses to meet the internal needs.
>It's external communication which needs to switch to IPv6. Internal
>communication just comes along for the ride.
If people start supplying CPE that are running IPv6 on the outside and
IPv4 NAT in the inside, then that would just fine, in the sense that the
users (in this case including the self-administrators of these small
enterprise networks) won't notice the difference.
--
Roland Perry
- References:
- quietly....
- From: rcarpen at network1.net (Randy Carpenter)
- quietly....
- From: davei at otd.com (Dave Israel)
- quietly....
- From: drais at icantclick.org (david raistrick)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: john at sackheads.org (John Payne)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: john at sackheads.org (John Payne)
- quietly....
- From: lists at internetpolicyagency.com (Roland Perry)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: lists at internetpolicyagency.com (Roland Perry)
- quietly....
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- quietly....
- From: lists at internetpolicyagency.com (Roland Perry)
- quietly....
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)