[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
quietly....
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:46 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:09:50 GMT, John Curran said:
>> We had a small ramp up in December (about 25% increase) but that is within
>> reasonable variation. Today was a little different, though, with 4 times
>> the normal request rate... that would be a "rush".
>
> Any trending on the rate of requests for IPv6 prefixes?
More interesting would be re-requests - organizations exhausting an
initial allocation and requiring more. People asking for the first
one just indicates initial adoption rates.
Other than experimental blocks, I am generally under the impression
that IPv6 allocations are designed to avoid that being necessary for
an extended period of time. If that is not true, then that's a flag.
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com
- References:
- quietly....
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: tme at americafree.tv (Marshall Eubanks)
- quietly....
- From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
- quietly....
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- quietly....
- From: drais at icantclick.org (david raistrick)
- quietly....
- From: paul at paulgraydon.co.uk (Paul Graydon)
- quietly....
- From: msa at latt.net (Majdi S. Abbas)
- quietly....
- From: paul at paulgraydon.co.uk (Paul Graydon)
- quietly....
- From: lee at asgard.org (Lee Howard)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: paul at paulgraydon.co.uk (Paul Graydon)
- quietly....
- From: kevin at steadfast.net (Kevin Stange)
- quietly....
- From: jcurran at arin.net (John Curran)
- quietly....
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)