[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)
- Subject: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:48:58 +0900
- In-reply-to: <1296604062.16035.69.camel@home>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1296595999.16035.6.camel@home> <m24o8nxvg5.wl%[email protected]> <1296604062.16035.69.camel@home>
>>> In this context, at least, perhaps the NIR should be considered
>>> superfluous or redundant? What is the operational rationale behind the
>>> NIR level? Wouldn't a flatter RIR-LIR structure do just fine?
>>
>> and then, by inference, what is the use of the RIR level?
>
> A meeting point for communities, potentially able to reflect a consensus
> view of policies and moderate "NIR" and other might be more unilateral
> initiatives. If one individual of a community goes "insane", enable the
> remaing ones to modrate.
and then, by inference, you can see how people justify the NIRs
randy