[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
quietly....
________________________________
From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com>
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
>If you're determined to destroy IPv6 by bringing the problems of NAT forward
>with you, then, I'm fine with you remaining in your >IPv4 island. I'm willing to
>bet that most organizations will embrace an internet unencumbered by the
>brokenness that is NAT and >move forward. I do not think that lack of NAT has
>been a significant barrier to IPv6 adoption, nor do I think it will be.
Lack of NAT may or may not continue to be a barrier to IPv6 adoption.? However,
it certainly *has* been a barrier to IPv6 adoption - I have had customers tell
me that explicitly, and I have no reason to doubt them.
- References:
- quietly....
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- quietly....
- From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com (bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- quietly....
- From: tme at americafree.tv (Marshall Eubanks)
- quietly....
- From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
- quietly....
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- quietly....
- From: drais at icantclick.org (david raistrick)
- quietly....
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)