[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?

Subject: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?
From: msokolov at ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Sokolov)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:44:04 GMT

Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:

> There really isn't a lot of choice, 2 providers, and some minor choice
> in how much speed you want to pay for with each one.

Does that mean no CLECs like Covad or DSL.net who colocate in the AT&T
CO, rent unbundled dry copper pairs and take it up from there themselves?

Does that mean no ISPs who buy/rent last+middle mile transport from AT&T
ADSL network at Layer 2 (ATM) and provide their own IP layer?

MS

Follow-Ups:
- Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?
  - From: tvhawaii at shaka.com (Michael Painter)

Prev by Date: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?
Next by Date: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?
Previous by thread: fibr question - Please help
Next by thread: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread