Convenience or slippery slope... or something else?

[morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)]

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Reese <reese at inkworkswell.com> wrote:
>> A friend brought this to my attention:
>>
>> http://ipq.co/
>
> as an aside:
>
> <https://www.nic.co/>
>
> note the cert in used for the NIC's website... surely the .CO ccTLD
> could use a real cert?

also it's not clear that the ipq.co service is really all that robust
(if that'd matter to anyone) since ipq.co's nameservers:
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;ipq.co.                                IN      NS

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
ipq.co.                 900     IN      NS      A.NS.ipq.co.
ipq.co.                 900     IN      NS      B.NS.ipq.co.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
A.NS.ipq.co.            900     IN      A       212.110.169.105
B.NS.ipq.co.            900     IN      A       212.110.169.105

are the same host/ip.