[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses

Subject: Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:57:11 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Oct 20, 2010, at 6:46 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:

> On 10/20/2010 6:20 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
>> 
>> To make it clear, as it seems to be quite misunderstood, you'd have
>> both ULA and global addressing in your network.
> 
> Right. Just like to multihome with IPv6 you would have both PA addresses from provider #1 and PA addresses from provider #2 in your network.
> 
Or PI addresses from an RIR.

> Only nobody wants to do that either.
> 
There are lots of good reasons not to want to do that.

Owen

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: matthew at matthew.at (Matthew Kaufman)

References:
- IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: jeroen at mompl.net (Jeroen van Aart)
- Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (James Hess)
- IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)
- IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: matthew at matthew.at (Matthew Kaufman)

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
Next by Date: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA
Previous by thread: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
Next by thread: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread