[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses

Subject: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
From: matthew at matthew.at (Matthew Kaufman)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:50:06 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 10/20/2010 7:27 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
>
> * Stream Control Transport Protocol, first spec'd in 2000 (couldn't
>    be deployed widely in IPv4 because of NATs)
"because of NATs" s/b "because certain parties refused to acknowledge 
that encapsulation of SCTP in UDP would have operational advantages 
sufficient to outweigh the disadvantages".

SCTP only gets you 90% of the way there, but it is a lot closer than 
today's TCP is.

Matthew Kaufman

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)

References:
- IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: jeroen at mompl.net (Jeroen van Aart)
- Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (James Hess)
- IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)
- IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: matthew at matthew.at (Matthew Kaufman)
- Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (James Hess)
- IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
  - From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)

Prev by Date: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
Next by Date: RE: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
Previous by thread: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
Next by thread: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread