New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft

[ben at adversary.org (Ben McGinnes)]

On 7/10/10 12:08 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> so ... should domains associated with asn(s) and addr block allocations
> be subject to some expiry policy other than "it goes into the drop pool
> and one of {enom,pool,...} acquire it (and the associated non-traffic
> assets) for any interested party at $50 per /24"?

Interesting idea, but how do you apply it to ccTLD domains with widely
varying policies.  All it takes is whois records being legitimately
updated to use domain contacts using a ccTLD domain to circumvent.
Sounds like more of a stop-gap measure.


Regards,
Ben


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20101007/f5f15bfd/attachment.bin>