[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
- Subject: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
- From: eric at atlantech.net (Eric Van Tol)
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 09:51:28 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <33361326.494.1273861611194.JavaMail.franck@dport-d820.genius.local> <18959438.496.1273861781840.JavaMail.franck@dport-d820.genius.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared at puck.nether.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 2:49 PM
> To: Jack Carrozzo
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
>
> I'm curious what providers have not gotten their IPv6
> plans/networks/customer ports enabled.
>
> I know that Comcast is doing their trials now (Thanks John!) and will be
> presenting at the upcoming NANOG about their experiences.
>
> What parts of the big "I" Internet are not enabled or ready?
>
We don't see Savvis, Level3, or AboveNet with IPv6 capabilities in our region (DC). Two years ago, neither Verizon or AT&T had IPv6, either. Not sure about them now, as we no longer use them for transit. One would think everyone would have v6 capabilities in the heart of government territory, but okay.
For whatever reason, Verio actually charges (or used to) for their IPv6 separately from IPv4 and to top it all off, it wasn't significantly discounted.
-evt