[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Securing the BGP or controlling it?
- Subject: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
- From: hank at efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher)
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 22:56:29 +0300 (IDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <8805496.719.1273510074525.JavaMail.franck@franck-martins-macbook-pro.local> <[email protected]>
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Thomas Magill wrote:
> All of the major providers I have worked with have required proof of
> 'ownership' of address space or an LoA from the registered holder of
> that space before they would allow advertisements from me, which are
> then filtered. Is this not the norm? I can understand if they are
> talking about an operator making a mistake, but the article seems to
> imply that anyone running BGP can bring down the Internet... I think
> any competent provider can easily eliminate this threat from customers.
> Are there any types of penalties if an ISP is found to not be taking
> adequate precautions, other than the possible threat of losing business?
ROTFLMAO. Competent provider? Penalties? Threats? You made my day.
-Hank