[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Surcharge for providing Internet routes?
- Subject: Surcharge for providing Internet routes?
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 17:32:47 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ML
> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 1:44 PM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Surcharge for providing Internet routes?
>
> Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for
> providing a complete internet table to customers?
>
> Waive the surcharge for sufficiently large commits?
>
I had one provider once that wanted to charge me a surcharge simply for
the privilege of running BGP. The had "bgp charge" on their list of
things. Well, we were dual-homed to them and I asked how in the world
they expected to fail traffic over if we *didn't* run bgb. They should
be requiring I run bgp, not charging extra for it if they intend to meet
their own SLA. Static routing to a dead link is a surefire SLA killer.
The sales rep got a little red.
As for a full table, no, I have not paid extra for it.