[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Auto MDI/MDI-X + conference rooms + bored == loop
- Subject: Auto MDI/MDI-X + conference rooms + bored == loop
- From: jtk at cymru.com (John Kristoff)
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:07:44 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:09:22 -0400
Chuck Anderson <cra at WPI.EDU> wrote:
> Anyone have suggestions on Ethernet LAN loop-prevention? With the
> advent of Auto MDI/MDI-X ports on switches, it seems way too easy to
> accidentally or maliciously create loops between network jacks. We
Some time ago I did some work on implementing what cisco called 'port
security'. The idea was to add some layer 2 protection from a security
perspective. It turns out in practice, at least in the environment I
was in, they never happen. However, it did offer protection for loops
since if a secured port saw a source address show up another another
port, it would block it and generate logs, which we monitored and could
then go deal with while the network remained up.
There are some potential gotchas depending on how you implement port
security so you need consider carefully how you implement it if you do
it. Its been awhile since I've done anything in this space, but this
better captures my experience since my memory of it is beginning to
fade:
<http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/opsec/opsec.2005/msg00033.html>
John