[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NSP-SEC
- Subject: NSP-SEC
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:19:26 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:43:18 BST." <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:43:18 BST, Guillaume FORTAINE said:
> First question : Why was I able to find this mail on the Internet if it
> should be kept secret ?
Congratulations. You found an example of a mailing list where applying a
standard disclaimer by default *does* make sense, which then got forwarded
*by a coordination team leader at a national CERT* to an appropriate forum
so that action could be taken, but failed to take the disclaimer off the
bottom of that posting.
Double bonus points for finding a posting that discussed something *really*
sensitive, like "we've seen bots connecting to...". You *do* realize that
there's an estimated 140,000,000 bots on the net, right, and as a result,
some operation lists have *dozens* of "bots spotted connecting to" postings
*per day*.
And you wonder why you have a hard time being taken seriously.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20100319/963a0a60/attachment.bin>
- Follow-Ups:
- NSP-SEC
- From: jwbensley at gmail.com (James Bensley)
- References:
- NSP-SEC
- From: gfortaine at live.com (Guillaume FORTAINE)