[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FCC releases Internet speed test tool
- Subject: FCC releases Internet speed test tool
- From: akg1330 at gmail.com (Andrew Gallo)
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:06:22 -0500
- In-reply-to: <00a301cac200$bebfcd70$3c3f6850$@net>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <00a301cac200$bebfcd70$3c3f6850$@net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 3/12/2010 11:26 AM, Scott Berkman wrote:
> So have other people noticed that the Ookla/Speedtest.net/Speakeasy
> Bandwidth test often comes up VERY short on upload bandwidth results for
> anything other than residential-grade asymmetrical services?
>
> We often get complaints from customers saying "I'm not getting the upload
> bandwidth I'm paying for", and when we ask what they are using to determine
> this, the answer is almost always either Speakeasy or Speedtest.net.
>
> We certainly don't depend on or recommend these sites to customers (we have
> our own internal tools and usually recommend FTP or iperf), but everyone who
> deems themselves semi-knowledgeable seems to find their way there anyway.
> Do these sites simply not have the downstream bandwidth to handle the upload
> tests? If that?s the case I'd really like to see the admins add a
> disclaimer of some form directly to the site.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Scott
I'm seeing big disparity between upload and download speeds. I had the
same thought as to the testing platform expecting asymmetrical speeds
typical of a residential link.
Why didn't they go with NDT?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkuadI0ACgkQQr/gMVyFYyT5ywCfTjlYgTs9qV3AaXHsHX3wkm15
QJYAoJoSxNzDqrdX86MoLNB+gObbhZ9/
=qGyL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----