[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IP4 Space

On 04/03/2010 19:30, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja at bogus.com> wrote:
>> handling the v6 table is not currently hard (~2600 prefixes) while long
>> term the temptation to do TE is roughly that same in v6 as in v4, the
>> prospect of having a bunch of non-aggregatable direct assignments should
>> be much lower...
> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?

The opposite, but a clean slate means multihomed networks with many v4
prefixes may be able to be a multihomed network with just one v6 prefix.

Andy