[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Redundant BGP for lower cost
- Subject: Redundant BGP for lower cost
- From: jlewis at lewis.org (Jon Lewis)
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:12:06 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Alex Thurlow wrote:
> 2. Buy a Cisco/Juniper/whatever and then have the Quagga box as backup.
> 3. I have a 6500 behind the router that's just doing switching. Could I have
> something switch that to static route all traffic to one of my providers if
> something happened to the router? The 6500 has Sup1A with MSFC2 running IOS
> native.
>
> On the Cisco side, I see that we could probably run a 7200VXR with NPE-G1
> (about $6000 on ebay). Moving to the Sup720, even used is probably out of
> our price range.
If you were to upgrade the 6500 to a Sup720-3bxl or better, it would be a
far superior platform for handling multiple gigabit ethernet circuits and
full BGP than the NPE-G1. Sadly, the sup720 and required power supply and
fan card upgrades would cost more than that 7200/NPE-G1, but it'll route
considerably more traffic. I don't think you're going to get line-rate
GigE from the G1. You will with the 6500.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________