[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]

Subject: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
From: pauldotwall at gmail.com (Paul Wall)
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:05:20 -0500
In-reply-to: <m28waclibr.wl%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m28waclibr.wl%[email protected]>

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> nope. ?in japan, there is still far more powerpoint than packets. ?i
> have ntt ftth. ?it is v4 only. ?i have to tunnel to iij to get v6.
>
> do not believe powerpoint.

NTT also charges its (wholesale) IP transit customers a premium for v6
connectivity in Asia.

Dorian can speak better to their rationale, though I can't see it
helping foster adoption in this economy.

Drive Slow,
Paul Wall

Follow-Ups:
- [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)

Prev by Date: lt2p/pptp vpn concentrators
Next by Date: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
Previous by thread: Alaska IXP?
Next by thread: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread