[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
- Subject: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
- From: leen at consolejunkie.net (Leen Besselink)
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:38:29 +0100
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <FC5FF0B613540249959195342B6D034CC03822@worldmax-sbs01.Worldmax.local> <[email protected]>
>> Not comparing this to the former-DDR or Chinese situation (please refer
>> to my tin-foil remark above) a per-country specific prefix is not
>> necessarily a bad thing and may even have an upside.
>>
>>
> Care to explain what that could possibly be? (I simply don't see an
> upside to making it easy to censor the internet by national identity).
>
>
Maintenance of "GeoIP"-databases becomes easier and less error-prone ?
Possible less out of date because of it.
We've seen complaints about those many times on this list.