[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?

Subject: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:33:13 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:14:46 EDT." <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1280002667.12383.2.camel@petrie> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <9610.1280462130@localhost> <[email protected]>

On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:14:46 EDT, Atticus said:

> technology, and an inferior one at that. With IPSec compliance integrated
> into the protocol itself, and the hundreds of other benefits, why try to
> morph an old technology?

You *do* realize that IPv6 IPSec is the *exact same stuff* that's in IPv4, the
only difference is that a "compliant" IPv6 stack has to include it, as opposed
to the optional-but-all-major-OS-do-it status in IPv4, right?

Does anybody know of *any* products that support dual-stack and include
the IPv6 IPSec stuff but left the IPv4 IPSec stuff out?  I've never actually seen one...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20100730/96683ec5/attachment.bin>

References:
- 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
  - From: ipv3.com at gmail.com (IPv3.com)
- 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
  - From: sking at kingrst.com (Steven King)
- 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
  - From: nenolod at systeminplace.net (William Pitcock)
- 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
  - From: tal at whatexit.org (Tom Limoncelli)
- 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
  - From: grobe0ba at gmail.com (Atticus)
- 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
  - From: grobe0ba at gmail.com (Atticus)
- 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
  - From: grobe0ba at gmail.com (Atticus)

Prev by Date: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
Next by Date: Web expert on his 'catastrophe' key for the internet
Previous by thread: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
Next by thread: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread