[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical Integration WG for dummies
- Subject: I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical Integration WG for dummies
- From: franck at genius.com (Franck Martin)
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:11:54 +1200 (FJT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
The question too, is which model is mitigating the best the presence of rogue registrars (like domain tasting registrars, etc..)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joly MacFie" <joly at punkcast.com>
To: "Eric Brunner-Williams" <brunner at nic-naa.net>
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 27 July, 2010 10:00:03 AM
Subject: Re: I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical Integration WG for dummies
I found Milton Mueller's summary - noted at
http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=1006- useful.
Is there anything there that you would disagree with?
j
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams
<brunner at nic-naa.net> wrote:
> Actually the alliances visible at present are:
>
> JN2 proposal: Verisign, NeuStar, NetSol and eNom and others,
>
> RACK proposal: Afilas, PIR, GoDaddy, and others, including CORE.
>
> I look forward to your public comments, here or at the ICANN comment site.
>
> Eric
>
>
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie? 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
?http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
? Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
---------------------------------------------------------------