[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

I don't need no stinking firewall!

Subject: I don't need no stinking firewall!
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:46:07 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:14:05 CST." <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:14:05 CST, Ryan Brooks said:

> Everyone needs to listen to Roland's mantra: "stateless ACLs in hardware 
> than can handle Mpps".  It's more than just a hint.

I suspect that more than a few need to be reminded that "stateless ACLs in
switch hardware" is just another name for "switch that also does stateless
firewall".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20100106/ab0af8dc/attachment.bin>

Follow-Ups:
- I don't need no stinking firewall!
  - From: bjohnson at drtel.com (Brian Johnson)

References:
- I don't need no stinking firewall!
  - From: bjohnson at drtel.com (Brian Johnson)
- I don't need no stinking firewall!
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- I don't need no stinking firewall!
  - From: robert at timetraveller.org (Robert Brockway)
- I don't need no stinking firewall!
  - From: ryan at hack.net (Ryan Brooks)

Prev by Date: I don't need no stinking firewall!
Next by Date: I don't need no stinking firewall!
Previous by thread: I don't need no stinking firewall!
Next by thread: I don't need no stinking firewall!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread