[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?

Subject: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:41:08 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:

>  I still fail to see the value of LISP in a mature and sane  IPv6 world.

Abstraction of the global routing table away from direct dependence upon the underlying transport in use at a given endpoint network alone offers huge benefits for futureproofing; there are lots of other benefits as well, for mobility, CDNs, and so forth.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

 	       Sell your computer and buy a guitar.

Follow-Ups:
- Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Cameron Byrne)

References:
- Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
  - From: mohacsi at niif.hu (Mohacsi Janos)
- Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Cameron Byrne)

Prev by Date: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
Next by Date: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
Previous by thread: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
Next by thread: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread